The Scope of the World Food Crisis
The beginning of this article mostly talked about how the prices for commonly basic foods, like rice and corn, had become to high and as a result there were protests in more than 40 countries, this is know as the World Food Crisis. Towards the middle the article talked about the causes of the food crisis one being unseasonable droughts in grain producing countries caused by changes in the weather. Also in the middle they talked about solutions one being that if the low prices for raw materials that were present in the 1960's were considered a hindrance to development then the high prices today would too. Towards the ending the article talked about the reactions that the international communities had about the crisis, along with some examples of proposals for a sustainable agriculture.
Cheap Food
Basically for this article they are talking about how the workers on the farm are not getting the same treatment that American workers get. For example the article says that a lot of the basic rights that American workers get the farm workers aren't getting any of. They are making the farm workers seem like scaredy cats because they don't want to report labor law violations, but it's because they don't want to lose their jobs because they need to pay for food for their own families. In this article it seems that they are trying to make people feel bad for the farm workers, even though I agree that I don't like the fact that the farm workers hardly get any benefits I do not think that the author of the article should have out it in a way that makes it seem like the farm workers are too scared to stick up for themselves.
The Financial Crisis and World Hunger
In this article one thing that stood out to me the most that I really liked was the program that Muhammad Yunus had launched. The program was to help poor people survive by giving them tiny loans, but it was also created to spark the personal initiative and enterprise to pull themselves out of poverty. The reason that I liked this was because it’s something that could help a lot of families in the world. If every poor family in the world had been apart of this program then I believe that the World Food Hunger Crisis would be solved because no family would be in poverty.
Fields of Poison
In this article they are mostly talking about how the pesticides in a lot of the plants and foods are causing harmful side effects to the farm workers. Even though some side effects aren’t that bad like dizziness or numbness, there are more harmful effects that could cause pain and even death. In the article it states that the elimination of the hazardous pesticides is a sustainable solution to agricultural chemical exposure. The thing that made me angry about this article was the fact that the DPR sent out more warnings of violations than fines and not actually taking action on those farms just giving them a slide by. If they actually do the job that they are supposed to be doing, which is making sure the farms aren’t violating health and environmental problems, then there wouldn’t be as many farm workers that are having side effects that could kill them.
If you were going dedicate your energies to champion one of the issues in any of the writings, which would you choose and why? In your opinion, what is it about your particular choice that ranks it above all others?
If I had to choose I would choose the program that Muhammad Yunus came up with because it seems like a more practical issue that could actually happen. Also I think that it could really help with the whole issue on the World Food Hunger Crisis. Because as I said above if all the poor families in the world were in this program and they got small amounts of loan they could, in time, get themselves out of poverty and get their family back up and running.